<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A better look at what connects &#8220;s&#8221; &amp; &#8220;crm&#8221; in sCRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogibberish.com/2009/03/a-better-look-at-what-connects-s-crm-in-scrm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogibberish.com/2009/03/a-better-look-at-what-connects-s-crm-in-scrm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogibberish.com/2009/03/a-better-look-at-what-connects-s-crm-in-scrm/comment-page-1/#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogibberish.com/?p=116#comment-1741</guid>
		<description>Great story. Bravo.  Good use of definitions and semantics...
This is one of the more relevant stories on a fast moving target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story. Bravo.  Good use of definitions and semantics&#8230;<br />
This is one of the more relevant stories on a fast moving target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay Mehta</title>
		<link>http://blogibberish.com/2009/03/a-better-look-at-what-connects-s-crm-in-scrm/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogibberish.com/?p=116#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>Somehow I am finding the discussion getting too much into definition and semantics and to that extent, away from the business. Irrespective of the terminology that you use, what is important, is to recognize issues like pain points, business opportunities, consumer benefits and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I am finding the discussion getting too much into definition and semantics and to that extent, away from the business. Irrespective of the terminology that you use, what is important, is to recognize issues like pain points, business opportunities, consumer benefits and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
